GGUF
conversational
zerofata commited on
Commit
705d96b
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): bab4192

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +4 -4
README.md CHANGED
@@ -539,11 +539,11 @@ base_model:
539
  </div>
540
  <div class="gs-sbody">
541
  <p></p>
542
- <p>A finetune of Gemma 4 31B designed for creative tasks. Intended to be a more creative version of <a href="https://huggingface.co/zerofata/G4-MeroMero-31B">G4-MeroMero-31B</a>.</p>
543
  <p>This model is the result of a lot of experimentation and learning. Trying to make Gemma 4 more creative without destroying the intelligence is... difficult. To put it mildly.</p>
544
  <p style="margin-top:16px">Heavily inspired by a few research papers, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03136">StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fiction
545
- </a> and particularly <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26492">Elias in the Lighthouse, Again?</a>. Measuring these narrative tics and attractors against simple prompts seems to be a good way to target the model's slop: anything that repeatedly occurs across generations of such a generic prompt is something the model is overusing.</p>
546
- <p>Compared to the original, swipes are notably more diverse and feel less like Gemma. RP slop is measurably lower (at least for the type of slop I measure). IFEval / GSM8K / MMLU-Pro are more or less the same as stock. The only intelligence drop I've really noticed so far is when you get a swipe that goes a bit hot.</p>
547
  <p>Supports both thinking and non thinking. Reasoning averages longer than stock Gemma 4, but shorter than MeroMero v1.</p>
548
  </div>
549
  </div>
@@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ base_model:
603
  <div class="gs-sbody">
604
  <table class="gs-etable">
605
  <tr><th></th><th class="gs-ecol">Mero Mero v2</th><th>Mero Mero v1</th><th>Stock Gemma 4</th></tr>
606
- <tr class="gs-egroup"><td colspan="4">Swipe diversity &mdash; given an RP conversation, with 8 swipes, measures how different the ideas in those swipes are, GLM-judged</td></tr>
607
  <tr><td>Thinking off</td><td class="gs-best">0.72</td><td>0.57</td><td>0.43</td></tr>
608
  <tr><td>Thinking on</td><td class="gs-best">0.62</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.32</td></tr>
609
  <tr class="gs-egroup"><td colspan="4">Slop &amp; attractors &mdash; lower is better</td></tr>
 
539
  </div>
540
  <div class="gs-sbody">
541
  <p></p>
542
+ <p>A finetune of Gemma 4 31B designed for creative tasks, particularly narrative RP. Intended to be a more creative version of <a href="https://huggingface.co/zerofata/G4-MeroMero-31B">G4-MeroMero-31B</a>.</p>
543
  <p>This model is the result of a lot of experimentation and learning. Trying to make Gemma 4 more creative without destroying the intelligence is... difficult. To put it mildly.</p>
544
  <p style="margin-top:16px">Heavily inspired by a few research papers, <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.03136">StoryScope: Investigating idiosyncrasies in AI fiction
545
+ </a> and particularly <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26492">Elias in the Lighthouse, Again?</a>. Measuring these narrative tics and attractors against simple prompts seems to be a good way to target the model's slop and kick start giving Gemma 4 some diversity: anything that repeatedly occurs across generations of such a generic prompt is something the model is overusing.</p>
546
+ <p>Compared to the original, swipes are notably more diverse and feel less like Gemma. RP slop is measurably lower (at least for the type of slop I measure). IFEval / GSM8K / MMLU-Pro are the same as stock with no obvious degradation. The only intelligence drop I've really noticed so far is when you get a swipe that goes a bit hot.</p>
547
  <p>Supports both thinking and non thinking. Reasoning averages longer than stock Gemma 4, but shorter than MeroMero v1.</p>
548
  </div>
549
  </div>
 
603
  <div class="gs-sbody">
604
  <table class="gs-etable">
605
  <tr><th></th><th class="gs-ecol">Mero Mero v2</th><th>Mero Mero v1</th><th>Stock Gemma 4</th></tr>
606
+ <tr class="gs-egroup"><td colspan="4">Swipe diversity &mdash; given an RP conversation, generate 8 swipes and evaluate how varied the beats in those swipes are, GLM-judged with a rubric.</td></tr>
607
  <tr><td>Thinking off</td><td class="gs-best">0.72</td><td>0.57</td><td>0.43</td></tr>
608
  <tr><td>Thinking on</td><td class="gs-best">0.62</td><td>0.49</td><td>0.32</td></tr>
609
  <tr class="gs-egroup"><td colspan="4">Slop &amp; attractors &mdash; lower is better</td></tr>